Abby Finkenauer may be in the Iowa Senate primary runoff, court rules

Abby Finkenauer may be in the Iowa Senate primary runoff, court rules

Abby Finkenauer may be in the Iowa Senate primary runoff, court rules

Placeholder when loading article actions

The Iowa Supreme Court ruled on Friday that former Congressman Abby Finkenauer may appear in the Democratic primary ballot in the state Senate race, overturning a judge’s decision that she did not qualify due to issues with the state Senate. his petition for the appointment.

Finkenauer, who served a term in Congress from 2019 to 2021, is one of the top Democratic recruits in the race against longtime Senator Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa). The primaries are on 7 June.

“The attempts of the GOP to undermine access to the vote and our electoral process have been pathetic and desperate”, Finkenauer said in a statement posted on his Twitter feed on Friday afternoon. “Today they lost. With a unanimous decision from the Iowa Supreme Court, we are still in this fight and will beat Chuck Grassley in November. It is a good day for our democracy ”.

Two other candidates – retired Navy Vice Admiral Mike Franken and Dr. Glenn Hurst – are also running for the Democratic primary. Grassley faces a long distance challenge from state Senator Jim Carlin in the GOP primary.

US Senate candidates in Iowa are required to submit at least 3,500 valid signatures on their nomination petitions, including at least 100 each from 19 counties. Republicans tried to take Finkenauer out of the ballot by challenging three signatures: one with no date, one with an incorrect date, and one in which the petitioner wrote a postcode instead of a date.

Finkenauer initially persuaded a three-member electoral commission to keep her in the ballot. The two Democrats on the panel had sided with her, saying there was a precedent for accepting signatures with incorrect dates, as long as the signatures were legitimate. The third member, Republican Secretary of State Paul Pate, disagreed.

The Republicans went to court and late Sunday evening a judge ruled that the three signatures could not be presented and that Finkenauer had not qualified for the runoff in the June primary.

The Supreme Court decision on Friday reverses that sentence. According to the Associated Press, the court said the Iowa state legislature “did not include missing or incorrect dates as one of the reasons for supporting an objection to a petition” when it revised the law governing the naming of petitions. ‘Last year.

“We conclude that recent legislation prevails,” the court said, according to the AP.

If Finkenauer wins the Democratic nomination, he still faces a tough challenge in facing Grassley. A September Des Moines Register poll showed Grassley topped Finkenauer 55% to 37% in a potential match, well outside the survey’s 3.9 percentage point margin of error.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.